The following paragraph comes from an introduction to the Github Podman open-source project

Podman: A tool for managing OCI containers and pods

• A tool for managing：表示它用于管理、控制或操作容器。
• OCI containers：这指的是 Open Container Initiative（OCI）定义的容器标准，这是一种容器化技术。
• and：连接词，将两个概念（管理 OCI 容器和管理 pods）联系在一起。
• pods：这是一种容器编排的概念，通常包含多个容器，共享网络和存储命名空间。

Podman (the POD MANager) is a tool for managing containers and images, volumes mounted into those containers, and pods made from groups of containers. Podman runs containers on Linux, but can also be used on Mac and Windows systems using a Podman-managed virtual machine. Podman is based on libpod, a library for container lifecycle management that is also contained in this repository. The libpod library provides APIs for managing containers, pods, container images, and volumes.

• Podman：POD 管理器，容器管理工具的名称。
• tool：工具。
• managing：管理。
• containers：容器。
• images：镜像。
• volumes：卷。
• mounted into：挂载到。
• pods：容器组。
• made from：由...制成。
• groups of containers：一组容器。
• runs containers：运行容器。
• Linux：Linux 操作系统。
• Mac：Mac 操作系统。
• Windows：Windows 操作系统。
• using：使用。
• virtual machine：虚拟机。
• based on：基于。
• library：库。
• container lifecycle management：容器生命周期管理。
• APIs：应用程序接口。

All releases are GPG signed. Public keys of members of the team approved to make releases are located here.

• All：所有（限定词，修饰 releases）。
• releases：发布版本（名词，主语）。
• are：是（谓语动词，与 releases 形成谓语）。
• GPG：Gnu Privacy Guard（名词缩写，描述数字签名工具）。
• signed：签名（动词的过去分词形式，用于描述 releases 经过签名）。
• Public：公开的（形容词，修饰 keys）。
• keys：密钥（名词，宾语）。
• of：的（介词，用于连接 members 和 team）。
• members：团队成员（名词，指代团队成员）。
• the：指定的（限定词，修饰 team）。
• team：团队（名词，指代团队）。
• approved：获批准的（动词的过去分词形式，用于修饰 members）。
• to：到（介词，用于引导不定式短语 "to make releases"）。
• make：制作（动词，与 to 连接形成不定式短语 "to make releases"）。
• located：位于（动词的过去分词形式，用于修饰 keys）。
• here：这里（副词，表示位置，指的是公钥的位置）。

The only place to cry is in the bathroom and Dad's arms.

This is a question from Quora.

How talented do you have to be to get an interview with Google?

• talented：有天赋的
• get an interview：获得面试
• Google：谷歌

I’ve helped many people get into Google and other top tier tech companies. Especially software engineers in the entire spectrum of 0 to 40 years experience. Let me tell you with confidence that you don’t have to be as naturally talented as you’re thinking. As long as you are a sincere worker, who can focus on solving problems, that’s all they are looking for.

• helped：帮助
• especially: 尤其的
• people：人们
• Google：谷歌
• top tier：顶级
• tech companies：科技公司
• software engineers：软件工程师
• entire spectrum：整个范围
• experience：经验
• naturally talented：天赋出众、
• as long as: 只要
• sincere worker：真诚的工作者
• focus on：专注于
• solving problems：解决问题

Why? First of all, there is no good way to measure talent. In popular culture, we measure it with IQ. But there is also a large body of research which says that IQ is not correlated with success. Here is a relevant link for your reference. But, even if you don’t believe this research; how do you decipher talent by looking at someone’s resume? Resumes are usually not very well written and often don’t tell the truth either.

• measure：衡量
• talent：天赋
• popular culture：流行文化
• IQ：智商
• either: 而且
• correlated with：与...相关
• success：成功
• relevant link：相关链接
• usually: 通常
• reference：参考
• believe：相信
• research：研究
• decipher：解读
• resume：简历
• written：写得
• tell the truth：说实话

The second reason Google doesn’t insist on only interviewing talented people, is because they hire massively on scale. i.e., thousands a month, world over. If they insist on interviewing only people with talent, they won’t ever be able to hire and push great products out fast.

• Google：谷歌
• insist on：坚持
• interviewing：面试
• talented people：有才能的人
• hire：招聘
• massively on scale：大规模招聘
• thousands a month：每个月成千上万人
• world over：全球范围内
• push out：推出
• great products：优秀的产品

Third reason: Google does need people with high IQ but not every position per se needs high IQ. People who are diligent and have the right approach are also critical to any big company’s success. In fact, that is how large companies are built. There are maybe 10% of positions which may need innate talent to be successfully producing right output, but the other 90% just requires sincerity and dedication to solving tough problems. Talent is massively overrated in such positions.

• high IQ：高智商
• every position per se：每个职位本身
• diligent：勤奋的
• right approach：正确的方法
• critical to：关键于
• big company’s success：大公司的成功
• large companies：大公司
• innate talent：天生的才能
• producing right output：产生正确的输出
• sincerity：真诚
• dedication：专注
• solving tough problems：解决困难问题
• massively overrated：被严重高估

Finally and most fundamentally, they have great faith in their own interview process. The interview process is rigorous and only selects the best prepared candidates. Interview preparation for Google is a great proxy for your sincerity and dedication to solving tough problems.

The only time they have to use a loose proxy for talent, is when there are just too many applicants and very few positions to fill .e.g., freshers in satellite locations. There are limited fresher openings and if they go out accepting candidate profiles from everywhere, they will never be able to get through the interview process. So they prefer to go to top colleges, which are loose proxies for talent e.g., IITs in India. Even here, if you have a strong referral, you will get interviews regardless of whatever college you went to.

• great faith：极大的信心
• interview process：面试流程
• rigorous：严格的
• selects：选择
• best prepared candidates：最充分准备的候选人
• Interview preparation：面试准备
• sincerity：真诚
• dedication：专注
• loose proxy：松散的代理
• talent：才能
• applicants：申请者
• through: 通过
• freshers：新毕业生
• satellite locations：卫星地点
• limited fresher openings：有限的新毕业生职位
• top colleges：顶尖学院
• strong referral：强大的内部推荐

Summary: Nix the thought of talent. It’s a very limiting thought nor is it supported by research. Focus instead on making your profile presentable and more importantly, on preparing for the interview process.

Do let us know if you need help, our staff are ex-Google recruiters and they understand how interviewees succeed. Our typical audience is software engineers with anywhere from 0 to 40 years of experience, with a strong desire to uplevel their careers in a variety of ways. We have a lot of confidence in our methodology. Those who follow it even approximately to the tee succeed. Otherwise we’ll refund your fees.

We have cohorts starting every 2–3 weeks, but remain booked much in advance. If you’re interested, then please do plan early!

• Nix：放弃
• talent：天赋
• limiting thought：限制性思维
• supported by research：得到研究支持
• focus instead on：相反，重点放在
• presentable：可呈现的
• preparing for：准备
• interview process：面试过程
• ex-Google recruiters：前谷歌招聘人员
• interviewees：面试者
• uplevel：提升
• careers：职业生涯
• methodology：方法论
• follow it to the tee：严格遵循
• refund：退还
• fees：费用
• cohorts：学员组
• booked in advance：提前预订
• plan early：提前计划

This is a question from Quora.

Is it true that many people in schools regard computer science students in universities as free computer repairers for granted, but what they learn is quite different from computer repair?

• regard：认为
• computer science：计算机科学
• students：学生
• universities：大学
• free：免费
• computer repairers：计算机维修员
• for granted：理所当然地
• learn：学习
• quite different：完全不同的

Yes and yes. And it’s not absurd; you might ask your English major friend for help editing a paper. It’s not necessarily a good idea, though, in both cases. I can guarantee that computer science students learn little to nothing about computer repair in the computer science courses (this isn’t necessarily true at a community college, though). If they know anything, it’s out of personal experience, interest, or a part-time job. And if you ask a friend for a favor, be respectful about it and either “pay back” when you can, or do something nice for them.

The moments that moved Clannad